Rolling Stone magazine
Oct. 2nd, 2010 11:49 amHas anyone seen Rolling Stone magazine this month? They interviewed me a couple of weeks ago. I told them in no uncertain terms that I didn’t write porn, that (from what I could tell from my fan mail) more than half of my readers were gay men, that I didn’t write for straight women only and wouldn’t know how, that there were gay men and women of all sexualities in m/m romance, and that of the four authors of Running Press’ m/m romance line, I was the only straight woman. They seemed interested and surprised about this last fact, so I thought for sure that bit of information might make it into the article. I asked them to assure me that they would not put the article out under a title that suggested m/m romance was gay porn for straight women, and they said that no, of course they wouldn’t.
I haven’t seen the resulting article, so I can’t tell whether any of that got through or not, or whether I might as well have saved my breath. Despite asking if I could see the article before it went out, that never happened. I can’t subscribe to the online magazine in order to read the article because it insists I need an American address and post code. But the title of the article appears to be “Man-on-man porn for straight women” so I don’t hold out a lot of hope. Is it as bad as it sounds?
( Read the rest of this entry » ).