Lord John’s mother is getting re-married, and the change threatens to stir up more than one thing which should remain hidden. For a start John is in danger of falling very much in love with his new step-brother to be, Percy, a love which is distinctly reciprocated. But in a more sinister turn of events, the fact that John’s mother now has a protector to whom she can speak of the past alarms the murderer of John’s father. Attempts are made on John’s life, his brother and mother are warned off with pages of a missing diary, and a conspiracy and scandal which has hung over the Grey family name for years threatens to burst back into life.
In the middle of all this, John and Hal’s regiment are posted to the
I think I said in my review of ‘Lord John and the Private Matter’ that I liked that book because it was not as overwrought as the Outlander series, and because it didn’t have Jamie Fraser in it. This book, alas, was as overwrought as the Outlander series, and did have Jamie Fraser in it, with all his (to me) graceless, unattractive, overbearing, arrogant macho bullshit. Consequently I didn’t enjoy it half as much as ‘Lord John and the Private Matter.’ I like a happy ending, and this book did not have it – in fact, when I put the book down at the end I felt severely depressed. My respect for Lord John himself decreases with every instance of his inability to get over the fact that Jamie Fraser is a homophobic git who will never love him, and if I never read another book in which the tedium of troop maneuvers on the Prussian front is so excruciatingly well drawn (yes ‘Temeraire: Black Powder War’ I’m looking at you too) I will be very happy.
However, having said all of that, all the reasons why I loved the first Lord John book still apply – the gorgeous, fully immersive experience of living in the 18th Century in
no subject
Date: 2007-09-16 10:41 pm (UTC)Are the Lord John novels the type that really ought to be read in order, or can one pick them up in any order and not feel terribly at sea?
no subject
Date: 2007-09-17 03:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-17 10:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-17 11:01 am (UTC)I didn't like the last scene with Fraser either, just because it felt so much as though it was meant to be some sort of compensation, and it *wasn't* - it was just more of the same old poisonous unrequitedness. I like John too much to want that to carry on any longer than it has to, so it felt bad to me to have that relationship win out against the more healthy one, if you see what I mean.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-17 12:58 pm (UTC)But Amazon says there are three Lord John books.
Don't tell me I've finally found an author I get before the Brits do? (I'm still annoyed at the lag time for Lindsey Davis's Falco series to appear here in the US. It's not like she has to hunt out a new US publisher every time!)
no subject
Date: 2007-09-17 03:08 pm (UTC)I will probably read this one too, just for 18th Century's sake, yet...
How much depressing is it ? At present I'm not in the mood for depressing stories where my fav fictional characters are hurt, physically maimed, psychologically devastated, or doomed to eternal unhappines because of their unrequited in love for stolid, totally undeserving machos, etc etc.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-17 03:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-17 03:43 pm (UTC)If you want to really enjoy it I would say it's worth getting it and reading up to the sex scene and stopping there. You're not missing a lot after that, other than angst and anguish :) (Though the O'Higgins brothers make for a star turn at the end, if you get that far.)
no subject
Date: 2007-09-17 04:18 pm (UTC)And the post sex-scene part can always come useful a day I feel like reading something sad. I'm not usually so fiercely opposed to fictional angst. Just a bit stressed and over-tired. :)